翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Eaton School ・ Eaton School (Norridgewock, Maine) ・ Eaton Site ・ Eaton Socon ・ Eaton Socon Castle ・ Eaton Socon Rural District ・ Eaton Square ・ Eaton Stannard Barrett ・ Eaton Township ・ Eaton Township, Kearney County, Nebraska ・ Eaton Township, Lorain County, Ohio ・ Eaton Township, Michigan ・ Eaton Township, Warren County, Ohio ・ Eaton Township, Wyoming County, Pennsylvania ・ Eaton v. Boston, Concord & Montreal Rail Road ・ Eaton v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n ・ Eaton Vance ・ Eaton's ・ Eaton's / John Maryon Tower ・ Eaton's agar ・ Eaton's Annex ・ Eaton's BC Book Award ・ Eaton's Building (Saskatoon) ・ Eaton's catalogue ・ Eaton's Corrasable Bond ・ Eaton's inequality ・ Eaton's Ninth Floor Restaurant ・ Eaton's pintail ・ Eaton's reagent ・ Eaton, Brown County, Wisconsin Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Eaton v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n ： ウィキペディア英語版 Eaton v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n Eaton v. Federal National Mortgage Association is a 2012 opinion by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC), which set a precedent about foreclosure defenses and attracted national attention. ==Case== The case involved a homeowner (Henrietta Eaton) who lost her house in Massachusetts via a foreclosure sale after defaulting on her mortgage. Eaton then filed a suit against Fannie Mae in Massachusetts Superior Court alleging that the record holder of the mortgage did not also hold the promissory note at the time of foreclosure. Due to this alleged lack of unity at the time of sale, Eaton was alleging that property title was invalid. In its opinion, the S.J.C. asserted that although the statutes and case law from the nineteenth century implied that the mortgagee should also hold the note at time of sale, the court would not apply the requirement of unity retroactively to June 22, 2012, but only prospectively from that date because the law was "ambiguous" and a retroactive application would have voided thousands of titles. Therefore, foreclosure notices after this date may only properly precede a sale if the mortgagee holds the promissory note or has an agent that holds the note on the mortgagee's behalf at the time of the notices of sale. This requirement may be proven through an affidavit 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Eaton v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.